IS is not just a Muslim problem

Why do so many people in Germany assume that Muslims automatically sympathise more with the terrorists of IS than with those who are helping their victims? And why is so little notice being taken of the countless statements made by Muslim theologians and intellectuals who have distanced themselves from the terrorists' appalling acts? A commentary by Katajun Amirpur

By Katajun Amirpur

"Muslims, distance yourselves from terrorism!" This is the call we hear whenever acts of terrorism are carried out in the name of Islam. The strange thing is, however, that when Muslims do distance themselves from terrorism, it is barely registered by society at large. It is almost as if people don't want to believe that this is even possible. Yet all relevant authorities in the Islamic world, including the genuinely fundamentalist Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, have strongly condemned the so-called "Islamic State".

Similarly, we professors of Islamic Theology in Germany have distanced ourselves from these atrocities. A statement issued by my colleagues and I stresses that "we strictly reject any interpretation of Islam that perverts its message into an archaic ideology of hate and violence."

Muslim umbrella organisations have also distanced themselves several times from violent groups and their actions. The current situation is similar to the one that followed 9/11. Back then too, we were accused of not distancing ourselves from the culprits, even though tens of thousands of Muslims took to the streets of Cologne to demonstrate against the atrocity.

Dr Katajun Amirpur (photo: Georg Lukas)
Dr Katajun Amirpur is Professor is Islamic Studies/Islamic Theology at the Academy of World Religions at the University of Hamburg. The German-Iranian journalist and Islamic scholar became the first female Professor of Islamic Studies at a German university

Lack of awareness

I am not only angry about the lack of awareness of Muslims' efforts to distance themselves from such groups and actions. I am also angry about the level of general ignorance. It is, after all, Muslims who are attempting to put a stop to the so-called "Islamic State". Why do so many believe that German Muslims sympathise more with those Muslims who persecute Yazidis and Christians than with those Muslims who offer the victims of this persecution help and shelter? Apparently, word has not spread, as this belief is still firmly entrenched. This is not a fight between Muslims and the West. First and foremost, it is Sunni Kurds and Shia Muslims who are fighting the IS terrorists and taking in refugees.

And why is it not a matter of course to assume that Muslims in Germany do not support terrorist acts? Why should we? Is the reason down to the claim recently made in the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung" newspaper that Islam does not prohibit killing? This assertion was made by Martin Rhonheimer, professor of ethics at the Pontifical University of The Holy Cross in Rome. According to the professor, Islamic theology does not possess the argumentative resources needed to condemn the murders committed by the so-called "Islamic State". This is why, he concludes, Islamic theologians and, correspondingly, Muslim lay people cannot be against the so-called "Islamic State".

So because Islam does not prohibit killing, Muslims have to distance themselves from terrorist acts and the people who perpetrate them. Moreover, because Islam does not prohibit killing, we can assume that Muslims can see a point in IS terrorism. Is Rhonheimer truly ignorant of the fact Islam prohibits killing, or is he intentionally withholding what he knows? I believe that the latter is more likely to be the case, and because this would be a wilful falsification of the facts, it would mean he was clearly motivated by Islamophobia.

Nonsense written about Islam

As an attentive newspaper-reader, I have read a great deal of nonsense about Islam. However, the debate in recent weeks has sunk to new depths.

When the flagship of quality journalism, the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung", circulates such nonsense, and when the liberal newspaper "Die Zeit" chooses as its in-house author on Islam Hamed Abdul Samad (the author of a book on "Islamic fascism" that has been picked to pieces by all experts because of Samad's obvious ignorance of Islamic tradition and Arab history), then there is no need to be surprised by the statements made by Nikolaus Fest in the "Bild" newspaper. He recently asked whether "religion poses a barrier to integration" and promptly provided the answer himself: "Yes, when it comes to Islam."

If Islam is truly a barrier to integration, then it follows that Muslims cannot be part of Germany. After all, only a fundamentalist Muslim is a real Muslim. It also follows that Muslims can not of course be part of this society and that there can be no automatic assumption that any Muslim is opposed to violence, as is naturally and justifiably assumed to be the case with respect to the majority of non-Muslim German citizens.

Open Day at the Sehitlik Mosque in Berlin-Neukölln in October 2013 (photo: picture-alliance/ZB)
"Together, we have to ask ourselves what has gone wrong here. Why do so many young people, men in particular, consider jihadism as a legitimate option? What makes it so attractive?" writes Katajun Amirpur

Not part of society

The fact that Muslims should set an example as Muslims and not as citizens of this country fills me with a great sense of unease. When the candlelight vigils took place in protest against the murders in Mölln and Solingen or when events such as "Birlikte" (Stand Together) take place, as was recently the case in Cologne, it has always been a matter of standing together as a community and making a stand together. But when we have to make a stand as Muslims, then we are not perceived as part of German society, but as the "others", the ones who do not belong and who must first prove that they are suitable for admission. This happens time and time again.

The problem with which IS confronts German society is not, however, just a Muslim problem. One fifth of all jihadists who have left Germany to fight in Iraq and Syria are converts to Islam. Researchers agree that these individuals have converted directly to jihadism. A number of them know so little about Islam that they bought "Islam for Dummies" on Amazon to read on their journey.

Together, we have to ask ourselves what has gone wrong here. Why do so many young people, men in particular, consider jihadism as a legitimate option? What makes it so attractive? This is not something one does out of any attachment to Islamic tradition. After all, Islamic tradition is the very thing that the jihadists are negating by resorting to a supposed original Islam.

If we believe that the problem can be solved merely by having Muslims diligently distance themselves from the atrocities committed by other Muslims, then we are not creating a "new German 'us'" but an even more distinctive 'you'. What we are experiencing here is not "Birlikte" but, once again, social exclusion. It is as if Muslims are being asked to prove that they belong.

Katajun Amirpur

© 2014

Translated from the German by John Bergeron